Comments on: 20 standards for interoperability http://gotze.eu/2005/07/20_standards_fo.html Enterprisey thoughts - John Gøtze Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:49:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: tout.pret http://gotze.eu/2005/07/20_standards_fo.html/comment-page-1#comment-174 tout.pret Fri, 03 Mar 2006 23:58:01 +0000 http://slashdemocracy.org/wordpress/?p=456#comment-174 Greetings, Can you tell me the definition of "open standard" according to the Ministry? Is this the same as in Norway? Other European countries? Thanks much. Greetings,

Can you tell me the definition of “open standard” according to the Ministry? Is this the same as in Norway? Other European countries? Thanks much.

]]> By: Jacob Bøtter http://gotze.eu/2005/07/20_standards_fo.html/comment-page-1#comment-173 Jacob Bøtter Sun, 03 Jul 2005 23:48:39 +0000 http://slashdemocracy.org/wordpress/?p=456#comment-173 Sorry, I guess I read the list too fast. Good to see that SOAP and WAI is there too. But what about SMIL? When governmental organizations start videorecording their meetings and broadcasting it online, we'll need a way to know what's being said - SMIL helps accessbility matters related to this. I do not think you imply CSS by saying XHTML, but yes - it's better to write XHTML than just CSS. A lot of people do not really understand that the XHTML standard says that a layout does not consist of tables for presentation and keep doing what they've always done. By saying XHTML1+CSS2 you encourage design free of deeply nested tables. That would be a big step for the government. MWI is an important matter, but there's no real standards yet. We've just seen the tip of the iceberg and MWI is VERY new, it's just been a few months since Berners-Lee introduced the initiative in Japan. Sorry, I guess I read the list too fast. Good to see that SOAP and WAI is there too. But what about SMIL? When governmental organizations start videorecording their meetings and broadcasting it online, we’ll need a way to know what’s being said – SMIL helps accessbility matters related to this.

I do not think you imply CSS by saying XHTML, but yes – it’s better to write XHTML than just CSS. A lot of people do not really understand that the XHTML standard says that a layout does not consist of tables for presentation and keep doing what they’ve always done. By saying XHTML1+CSS2 you encourage design free of deeply nested tables. That would be a big step for the government.

MWI is an important matter, but there’s no real standards yet. We’ve just seen the tip of the iceberg and MWI is VERY new, it’s just been a few months since Berners-Lee introduced the initiative in Japan.

]]> By: John http://gotze.eu/2005/07/20_standards_fo.html/comment-page-1#comment-172 John Sat, 02 Jul 2005 02:51:37 +0000 http://slashdemocracy.org/wordpress/?p=456#comment-172 Hi Jacob, Well, we had to choose ... note that the list is not "just" about web technologies. But WAI <i>is</i> on the list! And SOAP is part of WS-I Basic Profile. Isn't both CSS and MWI somehow implied when we emphasise XHTML? Perhaps not directly ... The rest are in <a href="http://standarder.oio.dk" rel="nofollow">the framework</a> though. Hi Jacob,

Well, we had to choose … note that the list is not “just” about web technologies.
But WAI is on the list! And SOAP is part of WS-I Basic Profile.
Isn’t both CSS and MWI somehow implied when we emphasise XHTML? Perhaps not directly …
The rest are in the framework though.

]]> By: Jacob Bøtter http://gotze.eu/2005/07/20_standards_fo.html/comment-page-1#comment-171 Jacob Bøtter Sat, 02 Jul 2005 02:39:09 +0000 http://slashdemocracy.org/wordpress/?p=456#comment-171 Good to see XHTML on that list, but why no CSS? XML-RPC/SOAP? DOM? SMIL? WAI? MWI? XPath or maybe XForms? Good to see XHTML on that list, but why no CSS? XML-RPC/SOAP? DOM? SMIL? WAI? MWI? XPath or maybe XForms?

]]>