<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Standards &#8211; A Critical Frontier for Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gotze.eu/2006/08/06/standards-a-critical-frontier-for-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gotze.eu/2006/08/06/standards-a-critical-frontier-for-research/</link>
	<description>Enterprisey thoughts - John Gøtze</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 21:14:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John GÃ¸tze</title>
		<link>http://gotze.eu/2006/08/06/standards-a-critical-frontier-for-research/comment-page-1/#comment-3181</link>
		<dc:creator>John GÃ¸tze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 21:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gotze.eu/2006/08/standards-a-critical-frontier-for-research.html#comment-3181</guid>
		<description>John,

I caught on using the &quot;ecosystem&quot; concept when I participated in the Open ePolicy Group&#039;s work with the Roadmap for Open ICT Ecosystems:
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/epolicy/roadmap.pdf
I now use it all the time ... 

I&#039;m not really sure about the species metaphor, but clearly standard making is at its core a question about community: Those that create the standard constitute a rule-based CoP; memberships are both individual and institutional, lot&#039;s of politics. And the interesting thing with standard making is of course that there is a wider ecosystem around the users of standards, where there are also a lot of CoPs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>I caught on using the &#8220;ecosystem&#8221; concept when I participated in the Open ePolicy Group&#8217;s work with the Roadmap for Open ICT Ecosystems:<br />
<a href="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/epolicy/roadmap.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/epolicy/roadmap.pdf</a><br />
I now use it all the time &#8230; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not really sure about the species metaphor, but clearly standard making is at its core a question about community: Those that create the standard constitute a rule-based CoP; memberships are both individual and institutional, lot&#8217;s of politics. And the interesting thing with standard making is of course that there is a wider ecosystem around the users of standards, where there are also a lot of CoPs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Smith</title>
		<link>http://gotze.eu/2006/08/06/standards-a-critical-frontier-for-research/comment-page-1/#comment-3178</link>
		<dc:creator>John Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 13:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gotze.eu/2006/08/standards-a-critical-frontier-for-research.html#comment-3178</guid>
		<description>John,

I&#039;m interested in the social interactions in that huge standard-setting ecosystem.  Is anybody writing about &quot;ecosoystems&quot; and &quot;species&quot; at a more detailed level?  For example, using those metaphors, do you think that the species are different kinds of communities of practice, or are they the MEMBERS of communities?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested in the social interactions in that huge standard-setting ecosystem.  Is anybody writing about &#8220;ecosoystems&#8221; and &#8220;species&#8221; at a more detailed level?  For example, using those metaphors, do you think that the species are different kinds of communities of practice, or are they the MEMBERS of communities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

