eGovernment
Stepping stones
There’s an interesting article in Enterprise Architect: Three Stepping-Stones to Strategic Architecture by Chris Barlow.
Barlow wants us to define a series of stepping-stones that “both pay for themselves with near-term business impact and lead you toward your enterprise architecture vision”. Hmmmkey. How? We must make each stepping-stone a “stable business platform”, that is, a “series of completed IT and business-process projects where you can pause and reassess the next stepping-stone”. OK, stable and completed. Good. But how? Patterns? Principles? Practices? (hey, three P’s!)
Barlow suggests three stepping-stones:
1. Get to basic architecture. A basic architecture is one that supports the current business processes and is characterized by very few duplicate applications, has separation between transactional and archival data, and has a consolidated infrastructure. Also associated with it is an architecture development and management council that defines application, data, and infrastructure standards and checks for compliance against these standards. You know you have a basic architecture in place if you don’t have three e-mail systems, two financial reporting systems, some Unix desktops, some NT desktops, and 15 different company Web sites, all of which look different.
2. Get to streamlined architecture. A streamlined architecture is one where the business processes and corresponding applications and infrastructure have been tuned such that there are no redundant steps and no choke points that degrade performance. Pick one or two business areas to tune business processes. … Consider an example of trade-offs: do I build a single, consolidated database where all data is in one place and managing and updating data requires doing it in one place? Or do I build a tiered database where the different levels can be optimized for different business needs? …do I use an off-the-shelf enterprise architecture framework? Or do I need to build proprietary connections between applications?
3. Get to strategic architecture. A strategic architecture is one where your architecture is truly your competitive differentiator. At this point you have examined your application portfolio, differentiated between value-add and nonvalue-add applications/systems, outsourced nonvalue-add applications/systems, streamlined the rest, and defined a portfolio of new investments that will deliver new capabilities and help the business move the needle to value-added differentiators.
Basic, Streamlined, Strategic. Sure, why not. Good point. It sure sticks to the keep it simple principle.

Architects and princes
On Friday, we launched our White Paper on Enterprise/IT Architecture. The translator is working hard on the English version, which should be available soon. I have put together an article with the main findings and conclusions from the White Paper and a bit of context about our XML-work.
On related issues, David Fletcher blogged about EA yesterday, with some good pointers. Barbara Haven read one of these, the Industry Advisory Council‘s Succeeding with Component Based Architecture in e-Government and found the Machiavelli quote from The Prince that I mentioned earlier, and which I appearently misquoted a bit then. I think it goes like this (via online-literature.com above):
…there is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things. Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new.
We should have used this quote in the White Paper, because it says a lot about architecture.
Dave also pointed to META Group’s Dale Kutnick and Tim Westbrock who talks about Managing Change Through Holistic Enterprise Architecture. Holistic EA? What they mean is that EA is not just about technology. Did I mention that our White Paper is very inspired by Meta Group’s thinking?
We are now continuing the architecure programme, and I will have a busy summer and autumn. I wonder if anyone is also interested in e-government architecture, and would like to spend some time together, talking and writing? I have a lot of old air-miles to burn, and can go basically anywhere. I need to spend some holiday time too, so it should be somewhere nice, so I can spend some time off there too. It wouldn’t hurt if you had a summer house or something
Drop me a mail!
Bill of Rights for Web Services
Tim O’Reilly asks Do We Need A Bill of Rights for Web Services? What kinds of terms of service do you think would create open-source-like freedoms in the web services world?
Phil Wainewright comments and asks to the commercial aspects. IMHO, these are just some of the aspects one has to consider. The wider organisational, political, and cultural aspects are just as important, if not more. Of course, I speak mainly about government, but quite frankly, I don’t think the situation is much different in the private sector.
Tim is coming to Copenhagen for the Reboot conference. I’ll be arranging a small brunch seminar with Tim and Cory Doctorow on Saturday 21 June, and thought we should spend some time trying to find some answers to Tim’s questions. My blogging collegue René Løhde and a few other colleagues from our agency and our ministry, as well as a few CIOs from other ministries will participate. I guess we will show Tim and Cory our national Infostructurebase and talk about our experiences with web services and XML. But I also want to introduce Tim and Cory to our new IT-policy framework, which will go public really-soon-now, and hear what they think.
Pre-announcing priorities
Mark Forman about getting the e-government priorities right:
“It’s about architecture, it’s about focus on the customers, and it’s about results”
Mark could have written the Danish e-government strategy, as next week’s announcement from our ministry will show. I could tell you more, but we have sealed lips until Friday 13 June. Hmmm, what a date to pick for a major announcement …
Journalists are welcome to contact us for preparing articles and news coverage.
