Author: administrator

  • A course for the course

    The EA-T8 course starts soon.

    I’ve been looking at potential extra-curricular course material about enterprise architecture. Here is what I have on my list right now:

    Introduction to the theme

    ZapThink (2003) Calling the Elusive Enterprise Architect: You’re More Important than Ever

    Nicholas G. Carr (2003) IT doesn’t matter, Harvard Business Review

    Marc Demarest (1998) CityWare: Information Technology Planning And Urban Planning

    John Hagel and John Seely Brown (2002) Break On Through to the Other Side: A Missing Link in Redefining the Enterprise (PDF)

    Spewak, introduction

    On June 13 2003 the Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation published a White Paper on Enterprise Architecture.
    DGEAF (Danish Government-wide Enterprise Architecture Framework):

    • EAS – EA strategy
    • EBA – enterprise business architecture
    • EIA – enterprise information architecture
    • ESA – enterprise solution architecture
    • ETA – enterprise technical architecture
    • Implementation

    I’ve listed some material for these areas below:

    EAS:
    Assuming we can’t assume the students have an academic background, we might have to start with some basic stuff.

    Porter, M (1996) What is strategy? Slideshow
    Ogilvy, J (2003) What Strategists Can Learn from Sartre

    But quickly on to EAS.

    Maybe we should use the IAC white paper on Interoperability Strategy – Concepts, Challenges, and Recommendations (more white papers at the IAC-EA SIG site, for example, the one on maturity.)

    Governance is a central issue.

    Maybe use stuff like the Governance Dashboard:
    Pardee, T (2003) Herding Cats for IT Governance, in Enterprise Architect, November 28, 2003

    Maybe a case? Vetarans Affairs! With Zachman and all.

    Look into different strategic approaches:

    System approaches
    Scott W. Ambler (2003) Agile Enterprise Architecture: Beyond Enterprise Data Modeling
    Ambler’s essay is a summary of a chapter in:
    McGovern, J et al (2003) The Practical Guide to Enterprise Architecture, Prentice Hall

    Framework approaches
    Classics: TEAF, Zachman, …

    (system vs framework? hmmmmm…..)

    EBA:
    Besides work that can be bought, what is central to EBA?

    John Hagel and John Seely Brown (2002) Control versus Trust: Mastering a Different Management Approach (PDF)

    EIA:
    John Seely Brown & Paul Duguid (2000) Social Life of Information

    Michael C. Daconta (2003) Designing the Smart-Data Enterprise, in Enterprise Architect, November 28, 2003

    ESA:
    Fielding, R T (2000) Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures, PhD-dissertation, University of California

    John Hagel, John Seely Brown and Scott Durchslag (2002) Orchestrating Loosely Coupled Business Processes: The Secret to Successful Collaboration (PDF)

    ETA and Implementation – later.

    Any suggestions for more to put on the list??

  • Adaptable Enterprise

    Adaptable Enterprise dot com
    Adaptable-Enterprise.com has been launched today by Ark Group. The site is about Permeating the IT services landscape in a dawning era of business process transformation. The site’s catch phrase: If your business is not already affected by utility computing – it will be.

    Features of the site:

    • The Adaptable Enterprise newsletter has been launched to “provide senior decision-makers with the 3rd party information they need to navigate their way through the growing mass of vendors and information surrounding this business transformation offering.” I contributed with a feature article, Architecting government, and can warmly recommend the free, bi-monthly newsletter. Ask Jacquie (address at link above) to become a subscriber, and remember to ask for the first issue.
    • Case Studies Section with a number of concise case studies/interviews. case 10 is about the Danish Government.
    • The Adaptable Enterprise Summit, announcement of a conference to be held in June in UK, which I think will be great.

    To celebrate, I have added stuff to the Utility Computing category in GotzeLinked. That means I now have a useful utility computing links service, available as RSS 2.0-feed, RSS/RDF 1.0-feed, and OPML-feed.

  • Structures in transition

    Ted Ritzer refers to a new study from IDC that analyzes spending on egovernment solutions in central and local public administrations. The study finds that with a compound annual growth rate of 8.8% from 2002 to 2007, egovernment will be one of the fastest-growing solution areas in Denmark. From the IDC press release:

    But there are many challenges ahead before an efficient digital administration can exist in Denmark. These include political challenges such as the Structural Commission and expected changes to government structures. There are also IT challenges such as integrating applications, developing internal organizations and work processes, and getting more Danes to use digital signatures.

    The “Structural Commission”, or the Commission on Administrative Structure, according to our Prime Minister, or the Structure Commission, according to Ritzau, who notes:

    Not just a battle over lines on a map, Denmark’s sweeping Structure Reform package will overhaul the way this country’s manages public policy.

    The more than 1.600 pages long final report from the Commission is only in Danish, and most of the media coverage about it also only in Danish.

    ITEK, the Danish trade association for IT, telecommunications, electronics and communication enterprises commented and argued that the public sector needs to define common IT-standards at a government-wide, enterprise-level. ITB, the trade association for IT-companies, has calculated on what the transition will cost, and argues that the IT industry can look forward to around orders worth 20 billion Danish kroner (around US$3b) over the next 5-7 years.

    No wonder Denmark came out numer 1 in IDC’s European eGovernment Services – Country Benchmarking and Market Forecast, 2002-2007. On this, ZDNet UK wrote: Scandinavian countries take e-government lead:

    Denmark was best prepared for e-government both in the ability of the government to deliver services online and in the public’s willingness to use them. Sweden and Finland were also well-prepared.

    I guess IDC wants to expand on the Danish market 😉 If IDC didn’t charge several $1000s for their report, I’d certainly get it and read it. But seriously, and of course very subjectively, I think we are doing quite well here in Denmark, and for the first time in years, I couldn’t think of a more interesting place to work with e-government issues. Thanks to IDC for confirming this.

  • Grand Central

    My GotzeLinked api has been listed in Grand Central’s web service directory in the References: Databases category. Great.

    The directory is available for syndication via web services. I think I’ll play with the WSD in-a-box kit. Look for Slashdemocracy as provider, right there next to Reuters 🙂

  • Enterprise Architecture, T8

    My return-to-university (teaching) plan seems to work out: 13 students have signed up for the Enterprise Architecture course, and we have a go from the IT-University to run the course.

    I look forward to the course, and will make every effort to make sure the students enjoy it too.

    Phil Windley has inspired me to establish a course blog (to be established). My co-pilot, S�ren, doesn’t blog, yet. The university also offers some collaborative tool, which we’ll look into.

    We have desided to use Spewak’s classic book as the basic course book. We’ll top that with a number of articles and book chapters during the course.

    Maybe something like:

    Marc Demarest: CityWare: Information Technology Planning And Urban Planning, from 1998.

    A few chapters from John Seely Brown & Paul Duguid’s SLOFI.com, 2000.

    And some of these.

    Any suggestions for reading material for EA-students?

  • Viva the evolution

    Tom Riley and his The Commonwealth Centre for Electronic Governance has published the International Tracking Survey Report, Number Five named E-Governance to E-Democracy: Examining the evolution.

    The conclusion:

    E-democracy is in its nascent state and while we cannot accurately predict what shape it will take in generations to come, we do know that there will be changes. The key to the success of e-democracy will be the participation and partnership of all the stakeholders in government and the citizenry alike.

    For the record: I’m no longer with the Swedish government, as the report states.

    Steve pointed to BBC on e-democracy, with him appearing on BBCWorld’s Click Online. He also said this is not supposed to be public until the new year, so don’t click on it until after the holidays.

  • Syndicating in atoms

    I nominated Atom as the Standardisation Project of the Year. Now I’ve added an Atom feed from my blog, supporting auto-discovery for those who know how to use that, and also clickable via the right menu. It’s a valid feed. Is there an authorised Atom icon? I couldn’t find one, so I made my own using Kalsey’s Button Maker.

    I also added an Atom category to my links collection. Feel free to suggest more links.

  • Less than satisfactory

    At last, The United States General Accounting Office publishes the report: Information Technology: Leadership Remains Key to Agencies Making Progress on Enterprise Architecture Efforts. The report, GAO-04-40, is dated November 17 but released December 18. GAO’s Randy Hite was scheduled to present the report at the GCN EA conference, but it was sealed for further political processing, and Randy had to improvise – which he did excellently, as one of the best speakers on the conference.

    The +400 pages report describes the Management Maturity Enterprise Architecture Management Maturity Framework (EAMMF) 1.1., and examines the state of architecture in US fedelral government. The conclusion (p 52):

    Overall, the federal government�s state of enterprise architecture management remains less than satisfactory, with little progress being made over the last 2 years.

    For a quick overview, see the Highlights. FCW also has a piece about it. GCN did one last week.

  • What’s up for 2004 in eGov?

    So, I looked back at 2003, the year of enterprise architecture, in an earlier post. I’m now in the mod for looking ahead and make a few “predictions” for the new year. What will happen in eGov in 2004? I’ll post some more thoughts on this over the coming days. One for now:

    2004 E-Gov Challenge of the Year
    Digital Identity Management, which might have won the 2003 award for Most Overlooked Burning Issue of the Year, but hasn’t become less important, on the contrary. Governments are poised to be one of the key players in shared authetication services and can play an important foundational role, as Phil Windley points out in his Digital Identity and eGovernment. Alan Mather has also been writing about the issues recently.

    In 2003, we in Denmark rolled out the national Digital Signature offering citizens and businesses public certificates for electronic services. The certificates (OCES) are politically mandated for future online public services, but the banks and other players already have own established solutions and are reluctant to move on to OCES, so we’re clearly not done yet, if anyone thought that was the case. The challenge is that digital identity management is about so much more than digital signatures. The Danish Immigration Service is a web service savvy featured case on LooselyCoupled.com, and a good example of the issues faced.

    META Group says it’s a longer journey:

    Identity management and security needs will cause an increase in enterprise directory services adoption through 2004, as existing federated directories drive more provisioning and directory integration tool use. Enterprise/extranet directory distinctions will blur through 2005 and beyond, as internal/external identity needs converge. Directory use for some application authorization roles will increase as directory functionality expands. XML will enable component databases (as next-generation directories) and better integration capability (2006-08).

    I wouldn’t be sorry to see Nikolaj return to his Digital ID Blog.

  • 2003 E-Gov Round-Up

    As the year is ending, we look back. I haven’t yet seen much year reviews on eGovernment apart from E-GOV: A year in review from FCW. It’s about US, but would apply for Denmark too: “Talking the talk, but a long walk to walk”, and “Focused on architecture, fuzzy on funding”. In the printed press, ComnputerWorld Denmark had a special section about 2003. There they said something like “A Good Year for e-Government”, and listed all the things that happened during 2003, and that’s actually been a lot, just here in Denmark. Going through my archives gave a pretty good overview, I’d say. I chose to make a number of nominations for “Of the Year”-highlights.

    E-Gov Strategic Choice of the Year
    Government-wide Enterprise Architecture (EA)
    Not just because it the only new category in my blog, and what I do 60 hours a week, but because this is indeed what I see from around the world. As the nominations below will show, not least in the US. Also the Canadian Government is working with EA , namely under the heading business transformation, and has eatablished a Business Transformation Enablement Program (BTEP).

    E-Gov Video of the Year
    NASCIOs Enterprise Architecture video library (link)
    NASCIO�s architecture videos are intended to serve as a resource for CIOs, architects and other IT experts in their efforts to present a compelling message describing the value of enterprise architecture. I have asked NASCIO for permission to translate/subtitle them into Danish.

    E-Gov Quote of the Year

    “It’s about architecture, it’s about focus on the customers, and it’s about results”

    Said Mark Forman, former e-government chief for the US Office of Management and Budget.
    Mark could also have gotten the “Biggest Loss for E-Gov of the Year” award, were it not for him continuing to come with good commentary from “the outside”. Here’s a more recent but also good one from Mark:

    The future of technology is signaling a shift in focus from proprietary systems to architecture, and the government needs to be ready for the change.
    Mark Forman, 11 Dec 2003

    Mark argues that government is beginning to move away from using massive data centers to manage systems, and that we see a commoditisation of technologies which is allowing agencies to take standardised systems and open source options and link them to business processes, hereby becoming an adaptive enterprise. To facilitate this development, Forman pinpoints the federal enterprise architecture as providing a framework, and pushing agencies to think in terms of architecture. He refers to the reference models in the architecture, with which agencies can move away from building their own components and instead customise those available and share solutions across the government.

    E-Gov Survey of the Year
    Accenture’s eGov Leadership Survey
    The survey ranked Denmark as number four in the world on e-gov maturity. Canada was – and is – number one.
    Runner-ups: Two reports: TNS-Global Survey, which shows that more than six out of ten adults in Denmark use government services online (hightest of all) and the RAND US/EU Benchmarking Report, which shows that Danes have to most positive attitude towards e-government services.

    E-Gov Publication of the Year
    “The E-Government Imperative”, OECD’s Flagship Report on EGovernment.
    The report and the related policy brief goes through policy lessons from current experience in OECD member countries and suggests 10 guiding principles for successful e-government implementation:
    1 Leadership and Commitment
    2 Integration
    3 Inter-agency collaboration
    4 Financing
    5 Access
    6 Choice
    7 Citizen engagement
    8 Privacy
    9 Accountability
    10 Monitoring and evaluation

    Excellent advice. Read the publication!

    E-Gov White Paper of the Year
    No doubt 🙂 That is our EA White Paper (get it here)

    E-Gov Reference Model of the Year
    Federal Enterprise Architecture Business Reference Model, BRM 2.0
    The Business Reference Model is “a function-driven framework for describing the business operations of the Federal Government independent of the agencies that perform them.” It is also called Wedding Cake because it is illustrated like this:
    FEA-BRM

    E-Gov XML Initiative of the Year
    The Danish Infostructurebase
    Our Infostructurebase (ISB) got world-wide attention recently, when we published the Microsoft Office 2003 Reference Schemas after an agreement between Bill Gates and Helge Sander, minister of science. Confused? Read the FAQ.
    Although XML in government is progressing, few governments have embraced XML at a policy, strategic level as well as a practical level. In Denmark, we think we’re different, and the ISB is central to briding the gap between policy and practice. As a repository, a community, an infosite and a discovery tool, it is unique in the world.

    Standardisation Project of the Year
    Atom, the up-and-coming format for editing, syndicating, and archiving weblogs and other episodic web sites.
    OK, it is not clear from that blog entry that the Real-time Simple Standardisation I talk about ended up as Atom, which is making real progress these days. Atom aims at being 100% vendor neutral, implemented by everybody, freely extensible by anybody, and cleanly and thoroughly specified. See the Atom Wki and the Cover Page for more information. Atom is interesting on many levels – as a standard for XML-feeds, but also with much wider potential. Atom is also leading the way to finally getting better blogtool APIs. It is no good that we’re stuck with XML-RPC. The Atom API was designed with several guiding principles in mind:
    – Well-defined data model — with schemas and everything!
    – Doc-literal style web services, not RPC
    – Take full advantage of XML and namespaces
    – Take full advantage of HTTP
    – Secure, so no passwords in the clear

    Some say that Atom is BigCo thinking. That’s not how I see it. OK, IBM staffs Atom work, and SOAP is a possible transport protocol, and it’s more complex than RSS, but it still doesn’t exclude anyone from anything, as it uses a REST Architectural Style. I think it is stuff like Atom that helps us understand SOAPs many layers – from Simple Object Access Protocol to Service Oriented Architecture protocol.

    Runner-up: RSS 2.0
    Dave Winer took RSS to Harvard, a bold move. He licensed the RSS spec under Creative Commons. Today is the One Year Anniversary of the Creative Commons tools and licenses, so CC is basically a 2003 thing.

    Global E-Gov Infosite of the Year
    Directory: O e-Government no Mundo
    Blog: David Fletcher’s Government and Technology Weblog